Let me start by saying that this posting will be a weekly venture. Every Wednesday after Work of Art, I will be posting a commentary on the show, and posting a work that I will make within the hour of watching the show as a direct response to the challenge. I became obsessed with the show since I auditioned for it way back when at White Columns. I actually saw Jackie that day during auditions and said hello. We knew of each other through going to MICA and it was an awkward moment because I’m not sure she really cares too much for me. Nevertheless she is the reason why I watch and am addicted to this show... Proud Pussy, caulk, self-aware whoreness, and all.
Let me explain to you a little something about Jackie. If you think Miles or Nao created personas for this show, I think you missed out on the biggest persona of all. Back at MICA I knew Jackie as the girl who always wore stilettos, and always dressed to impress. She carried herself as a woman who knew that men and women would look at her and acknowledge her aesthetically sexual and beautiful body, but there was always at least 25% of Jackie that will ignore the fact that she is responsible for this reaction, which is what I love about her. Her work is interesting in that it involves female empowerment through female oppression, but sometimes I think her imagery gets a little muddled with all the bras and thongs (and i think sometimes it gets confusing a little about whether it is empowerment or oppression that she is communicating)... any way, back to the show.
China Chow showed up at Phillips de Pury wearing an umbrella around her waist. Uhm. WTF.
I don’t agree with this challenge at all. Shocking work does not really exist- not to me at least. To be shocked, one would have to suggest that you have never even conceived of what you are being shown, and it is so grotesque that you can’t even handle the sensation. But with the rise of the Internet, I don’t think people are hiding themselves from visually explicit material anymore. I don’t really even find Piss Christ to be offensive or shocking in the whatsoever.
I remember giving a speech in high school, and an oral report at MICA about Andreas Serrano. Both times I had trouble with defending his ‘overly-shocking’ imagery as appropriate. Post graduating, I take a stand against his work. I don’t think that his work is all it’s cracked up to be. I don’t really want to get into it either. All I will say is that I remember when I first heard about the rapper Eminem, and I found his music provocative. Now when I hear of him I just wait and pray for the day when he actually kills his daughter Hailey, rips Kim up with knives, and commits suicide during an overdose like he raps about in his music. It’s like… all talk – no action, and I’ve been waiting for the punch line for way too long.
I dislike Miles Mendenhall. I think he is just like most of the white boy art school kids who play by the traditional rules of art in a very general way in order to make visually pleasing works that satisfy the mind and the eye. He is like one of those tightly wrapped conceptual packages that end up coming up empty to me. He makes art more like a math problem to be solved rather than a truly ephemeral creative intention. SO yeah. First erection – to last erection, and some genitalia/Mickey Mouse. We get it, you like layers of metaphor.
What was Peregrine wearing? It was obviously the same outfit her mom was wearing when she chose to name her Peregrine.
The fight between Jackie and Erik was absurd. Both of them should realize that artists working in within close quarters will be influenced by one another, and in no way does that bit of influence take away ownership over the piece. Simply acknowledge that the influence was there and move on. However, years later when the work is being viewed in a gallery or book, there would never be a tagline stating that “the interactivity of sharpie markers was suggested by Erik”.
Congratulations, Abdi. I do have to admit that I was sad that Jackie didn’t take this one home, though I wasn’t sold on her project until after she implemented what I will call “Erik’s Suggestion”. Abdi, on the other hand, had a very interesting concept from the get go, and I appreciate his honesty in regard to African American oppression and his bold statements.
Nao didn’t deserve to go home. Her performance was very ambiguous, and though we all know she had no idea what she was doing, it still wasn’t as bad as Erik's Sex Education.
John’s days were numbered from the beginning due to his uninteresting attempt at creating homosexually engaged artwork. I liked his general aesthetic, however.
I was actually interested in Jaime's piece a lot. The blanket statement of 'shocking' was looming over these artists far too much and did a disservice to the work. I thought her work was genuinely touching on some topics she seems to be interested in, and I liked to see her get more into herself as opposed to the past work this platform has brought out of her.
Erik really needs to stop making art in general. Some people are actually artists, and some people are just creative. I think Erik is just naturally creative. Maybe it would be best if Miles traded about 50% of his hyper-conceptualism with 50% of Erik’s tongue and cheek kitsch art making process.
And for my creation this week….
Now, Like I said, I don’t believe in shocking work. I don’t believe I failed myself in making shocking work either. I would say that the show failed at making a realistic challenge and harped over a long existing stereotype that art is supposed to ruffle up some feathers.